Legal Opinion

Estate of Ziegler

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2010No. E048555PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

The statute of limitations serves noble public policies. It " "'promote[s] justice by preventing surprises through the revival of claims that have been allowed to slumber until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared.' [Citations.]" (Parra v. City and County of San Francisco…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Jenkins v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thea v. KleinhandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Mcmackin v. EhrheartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Yeh v. Li-Cheng Tai, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Maxwell-Jolly v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Allen v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API