Segler v. Callister
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action for damages. An automobile admittedly owned by defendant, came into collision with a motor bicycle ridden by plaintiff. Plaintiff was injured, brought his action, was awarded a verdict by a jury, judgment followed, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
The principal point urged on appeal, and the only one here necessary to consider, is that defendant was in no way legally responsible for the injuries sustained by plaintiff. Herein the facts are the following: The automobile had been bought by defendant, who himself could not drive the car,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hall v. Puente Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Woods v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Nichols v. Hitchcock Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.