Legal Opinion

Higgins v. City of Santa Monica

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1964No. L. A. 27989PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to obtain an adjudication as to the validity of Santa Monica Initiative Ordinance 703, insofar as such ordinance prohibits drilling or prospecting for oil, gas, and other hydrocarbon substances upon the tidelands and submerged lands granted in 1917 by the State of California to the City of Santa Monica.

The case was submitted upon stipulated facts and stipulated issues, after which the trial court rendered judgment upholding the validity and enforceability of the ordinance and the legality of any expenditure of municipal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API