Legal Opinion

Kopp v. Tomascik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1933No. Appeal, 218Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action of mandamus was instituted by certain members of the National Slovak Society, a corporation of the first class, against George Tomascik, its Supreme President, herein called the respondent, to compel him to call a special convention of the society. By amendment, the corporation was made a party defendant. After the denial of his original and supplemental motions to quash the alternative writ, respondent filed an answer and a supplemental answer, and a trial was had before a jury, which found for plaintiffs. From the judgment entered against him,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rhinehart v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Gates v. KeichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Haag v. GoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API