Legal Opinion
Gasperi v. Cinemette Corporation of America
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-371PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SNYDER, District Judge.
Defendants Cinemette Corporation of America and Cinemette-Associated Theatres, Inc. (Cinemette) filed a Motion to Dismiss Count III of the Amended Complaint “for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of Count III”, which this Court treats as a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(h)(3)' of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 For the reasons which follow, this Motion will be denied.
Defendant Crown International Pictures, Inc. (Crown) has moved the Court for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Willmar Poultry Company v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., and Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wobb v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977