Legal Opinion

Garner v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1934No. 8 Div. 621PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Under our statutes, “embezzlement” includes statutory offenses which do not embrace all the elements of the English offense of embezzlement. The acts made a crime by section 3961, Code, omit some of the essentials of that crime, hut the statute declares that such conduct is embezzlement. So that to sustain a conviction on a charge of embezzlement under that Code section, it is not necessary that all the elements of the offense as it existed under the early English act (Knight v. State, 152 Ala. 56, 44 So. 585) be proven or charged, if the acts declared by the statute are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Ex Parte CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Coleman v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Town of Clanton v. Chilton CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alford v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Napier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Hamilton v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. HoliwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API