The State v. Clay
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMillian, Judge.
*473 The State appeals the trial court's order granting Henry Franklin Clay's motion to suppress the results of a state-administered chemical blood test, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that Clay did not voluntarily consent to the test. For the reasons that follow, we agree and reverse.
"On appeal from a ruling on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably to affirming the trial court's factual findings and judgment." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Jacobs v. State , 338 Ga.App. 743 , 791 S.E.2d 844 (Case No. A16A1115, 2016 WL 5489013 , decided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-FitzgeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Christopher John Watters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- Christopher Womack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Sheikh Abusai Fofanah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-FitzgeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.