Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Rumsfeld
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 2005No. 05-35005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on May 13, 2005, and reported at 407 F.3d 1018, is amended as follows:
At page 1022, right column, first new paragraph: modify the first full sentence so that it states: “It is inappropriate, however, to imply an intent to exclude when the contract itself specifies that many laws, only partially listed, affect the enlistment and that unlisted contingencies may cause an alteration in the contract’s agreed-upon terms.”
At page…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Capt. Milbert Mindes v. Dr. Robert C. Seaman, Secretary of the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Santiago v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005