Legal Opinion

Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1936No. 26105. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLCOMB, STEINERT, and GERAGHTY, JJ., dissent. This is an action on a promissory note executed by defendant L. Romano Engineering Corporation (which will hereinafter be referred to as Romano), and delivered to defendant Ryan (operating as Diesel Equipment Company) as a part of the purchase price of a Diesel engine, sold by the latter to the former. The purchase price of the engine was $2,250. The amount of the note was $1,500. Before maturity, Ryan endorsed and transferred the note to plaintiff for a valuable consideration.

Romano set up two affirmative defenses: (a) That the note was procured…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Eilers Music House v. Oriental Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Johnson County Savings Bank v. RappWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Weller v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nyquist v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Coson v. RoehlWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bowles v. BillikWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Coson v. RoehlWashington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API