Legal Opinion

Howcroft v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 28, 1989No. Civ. 88-C-0057APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff, Michael Brent Howcroft, asserts thirteen claims arising from his termination from employment with the defendant, The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (“Mountain Bell”). Mountain Bell has moved for summary judgment on all thirteen claims. A hearing on the motion was held on December 9, 1988. The court reviewed the oral and written arguments and other documents of record and drafted a tentative opinion. The Utah Supreme Court then entered its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Steven Wayne Agee v. Morton Thiokol, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API