Legal Opinion

CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 2024No. 5:18-cv-01245Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CMI ROADBUILDING, INC. and ) CMI ROADBUILDING LTD., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-1245-G ) SPECSYS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 488), filed by Defendant SpecSys, Inc. Plaintiffs CMI Roadbuilding Ltd. (“CMI Ltd.”) and CMI Roadbuilding, Inc. (“CMI”) have submitted a response in opposition (Doc. No. 506). I. Background Plaintiffs initiated this diversity action on December 20, 2018. See Doc. No. 1. This lawsuit stems from a series of purchase orders whereby…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Sterling Energy, Ltd., D/B/A Senco, a Texas Corporation v. Friendly National Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation and George W. Higgins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API