Legal Opinion

City of Jackson v. Williamson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1999No. 95-CT-01072-SCTPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

740 So.2d 818 (1999)

CITY OF JACKSON, Mississippi

v.

Charles WILLIAMSON and Beth Williamson.

No. 95-CT-01072-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

February 25, 1999.

William A. Gowan, Jr., Jackson, Attorney for Appellant.

Lance L. Stevens, Mitchell H. Tyner, Jackson, Attorneys for Appellee.

EN BANC.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

McRAE, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. Certiorari was granted in this case so that we might consider only the application of post-judgment costs, statutory damages, and interest against the state and it's political subdivisions. We do not decide any other issues.

STATEMENT OF THE…

Also in this document: Dissent · Prather; Dissent · Prather; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  2. Pruett v. City of RosedaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Albritton v. City of WinonaMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Presley v. Mississippi State Hwy. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wells v. Panola County Bd. of Educ.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mississippi Dept. of Mental Health v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Miss. Transp. Com'n v. Ronald Adams Cont.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. HawkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tunica County, Mississippi v. Town of Tunica, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Mississippi Department of Human Services v. McNeelMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API