Bidwell v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California
[At law. Action by Anna R. Bidwell against the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company to recover on a policy of insurance. Defendant demurs.
1Opinion of the Court
SAWYER, Circuit Judge.
Action upon a life insurance policy. The complaint contains a copy of the policy, but does not set out, either in haec verba or in substance, the “proposals, answers and declarations” made by the applicant upon which the policy was issued. The policy set out contains the following clause: “And it is also understood and agreed to be the true intent and meaning hereof, that if the proposals, answers and declarations made by the said Alanson C. Bidwell, and bearing date the fifteenth day of November, 1866, and which are hereby made part and parcel of this policy as fully as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Campbell v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Miller v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Rufus Bobbitt v. . Liverpool and London and Globe Ins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Kelsey v. Universal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Hogins v. Supreme CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. v. McWhirterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896