Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Crozzoli

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1988No. CR-88-0042PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSER, District Judge:

A variety of motions have been made on behalf of the defendants Crozzoli, Mastran-gelo and Okerwall who have been charged with conspiring to violate the narcotics laws. Crozzoli has also been charged with violating 21 U.S.C. § 848 (continuing criminal enterprise). Those motions seek the suppression of evidence obtained by the interception of telephone conversations and the execution of search warrants for the reason that the affidavits in support of the wiretap order and search warrants were legally insufficient; a bill of particulars; additional discovery and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  2. United States v. VolpeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. United States v. CannistraroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  4. United States v. BellomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. United States v. DeSantisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API