Legal Opinion

Christianson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1923No. 3819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of violating the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The only assignment meriting consideration is addressed to the exclusion by the court of the following question propounded to the jurors on their voir dire examination :

“Q. Supposing, after all the evidence in this case was in, and you had heard the testimony of the witnesses, and the charge of the court, and the argument of counsel, you would feel that you were not just satisfied, there was some evidence that indicated that the defendant was guilty, but you couldn’t say to a moral certainty and beyond a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Watlington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Kurczak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. United States v. Michael Allen WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API