Legal Opinion
D-M-C-P
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3846PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 644
(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3846 Matter of D-M-C-P-, Applicant Decided August 5, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Neither an Immigration Judge nor the Board of Immigration Appeals has jurisdiction to consider whether asylum-only proceedings were improvidently instituted pursuant to a referral under the Visa Waiver Program. (2) It is improper to deem an application for relief abandoned based on the applicant’s failure to comply with the biometrics filing requirement where the record does not reflect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bayo v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Bradley v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Bingham v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- KANAGASUNDRAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- McCarthy v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Katherin Mejia-Velasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Angel Garcia v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ebony Nasrine Danielle Phillips v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Eduardo Ariel Gomez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Xing Chen v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020