United States v. Carlton Ellis Allison
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This Dyer Act ease was remanded to the district court for a limited posLtrial hearing to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that the presence of the alternate juror during the jury’s deliberations affected the jury’s verdict. The factual circumstances requiring the remand order and the directions given to the district court for an evidentiary hearing appear in our prior opinion, United States v. Allison, etc., 5 Cir. 1973, 481 F.2d 468.
The trial judge has conducted an evi-dentiary hearing, the transcript thereof and the court’s findings and conclusions have been certified to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Carlton Ellis AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- United States v. Wilton ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James Hillard, Robert Allen and Samuel HillardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.