Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 2006No. Criminal Action 00-710PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Tyrone Martin has filed a pro se petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 asking this Court to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. He presents three arguments in support of his petition: (1) the violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) prosecutorial misconduct.
I. BACKGROUND
Following a jury trial in this Court, Tyrone Martin was convicted of possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and with carrying a firearm in relation to a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Frankentek Residential Systems, LLC v. BuergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bell v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hofferica v. St. Mary Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Zenquis v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.