Commonwealth v. Roman
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The Commonwealth appeals from a postverdict order allowing the defendant’s motion for a required finding of not guilty on a charge of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. Review of the order is governed by the sufficiency of the evidence standard set out in Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 677 (1979), see Commonwealth v. Doucette, 408 Mass. 454, 456 (1990); Commonwealth v. Torres, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 317, 323-325 (1987), in contrast to review of an order allowing a motion for a new trial under Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(b)(2), 378 Mass. 896 (1979), where the judge’s assessment of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DoucetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LabbeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MarreroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TraylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RomanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Ulysses H.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MaceyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.