Janeway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
WILSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B), the Court has reviewed the pleadings, and other papers herein and the attached Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate. The Court has also made a de novo determination of the objections filed by defendant.
IT IS ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving and adopting these Reports and Recommendations, (2) adopting the same as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein, (3) denying the Defendant’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Eleuterio MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas P. MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bielby v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Coletta v. MassanariDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Forbes v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022