Legal Opinion

Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Certain questions relating to the validity and interpretation of ch. 640 of the Laws of 1911, the act under which the Chippewa and Flambeau Improvement *529Company was organized, have been considered by this court in two previous cases, Chippewa & Flambeau Imp. Co. v. Railroad Comm. 164 Wis. 105, 159 N. W. 739, and Flambeau River L. Co. v. Railroad Comm. 198 Wis. 134, 223 N. W. 417. In the latter case, referring to ch. 640, Laws of 1911, it was said:

“We find the legislative purpose to be to improve and not to destroy- navigation, and, especially, to improve the navigation of said Flambeau river…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Permoli v. Municipality No. 1 of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lundberg v. University of Notre DameWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. Chippewa & Flambeau Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Opinion No. Oag 18-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API