Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Proceedings (T.S.)
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the United States to compel T.S. to comply with a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum requesting him to furnish blood samples to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the purpose of expert examination and comparison with other blood samples.
Relying upon Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(E) and the shield of secrecy under which the Grand Jury operates, the United States has stated that it is precluded from explaining to T.S. the reasons for subpoenaing his blood. However, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickens v. Oxy Vinyls, LPDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009