Legal Opinion

Hecht v. Yarnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. (Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N. Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bates v. EngelmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  2. Famigletti v. Del TerzoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Nosonowitz v. KahnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  4. Stevens v. LangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951