Legal Opinion

Bates v. Engelman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 29, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGtvern, J.

This is a motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that neither of the two causes of action which have been pleaded is sufficient in law.

It is alleged in the first count that the plaintiff delivered a diamond ring to the defendant in contemplation of marriage, that the plaintiff and the defendant afterwards mutually agreed to abandon their contract to marry, and that thus and thereupon ownership of the ring reverted to plaintiff.

It is plain that this count is insufficient in law; that the cause of action sought to be pleaded is barred by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Hecht v. YarnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plohn v. PlohnNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Splendore v. GuglielmoNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kaufman v. Rosenbach, New York County Courts1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API