Legal Opinion

People v. Leneschmidt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 203, Calendar No. 36,527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Complaint for bastardy alleged that the child was begotten on or about the 9th day of May, 1930, the occasion and circumstances being definitely stated. The proofs placed the time in the forepart of April, without change of the occasion and circumstances. Defendant claims fatal variance as to dates.

Conviction must be confined to the act charged in the complaint. Showing of other acts of intercourse is permitted only as bearing on the probability of commission of the one relied on. People v. Schilling, 110 Mich. 412. When the date is alleged with particularity, it must be proved as laid (Hull…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SchillingMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hull v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. People v. SwansonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houfek v. ShaferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. HelzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API