Hull v. People
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
The plaintiff having been condemned in a prosecution under the statute concerning bastardy, alleges error. . The complaint against him was by the woman, and it set forth the time and place -when and where the child was begotten, with particularity. She did not claim that there was any uncertainty or that she was not able to fix the place and the time also, within a day or two. *168She stated the time as the 25th or 26th of September, 1877, and the place as his father’s residence in Lock-port, St. Joseph county, and as helping to identify the occasion she stated further that his parents were away…
2Cited by11 opinions
- People v. DupounceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Houfek v. ShaferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. SchillingMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.