Legal Opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1997No. Nos. 90 Civ. 3473 (RWS), 92 Civ. 3900 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant John Crane, Inc., (“Crane”), has brought this motion for an order granting reargument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3(j), and for relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) from an order of this Court consolidating six separate asbestos tort actions for trial. The motion is brought in relation to the two consolidated actions in which Crane is a defendant: McPadden and Strafford.
For the reasons set forth below, the motions for reargument are granted and the relief under Rule 60(b) is denied.
Parties
Defendant Crane formerly manufactured packing products which…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Vito Matarese v. Eugene Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Air India, Ltd. v. BrienDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Alternative Debt Portfolios, L.P. v. E-Z Pay Services (In Re EZ Pay Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2008