Legal Opinion

Chewning & Sands v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error .to a judgment of the Circuit Court of King William, county, rendered April 9, 1896, in an action of covenant wherein: the plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs, and the defendant in. error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action of covenant was brought upon the following paper r

“Whereas, H. R. Pollard, substituted trustee for P. H~ Adams, with the consent of A. J. Ohewning and O. R. Sands has paid me the sum of eight hundred dollars ($800), which sum *668has been applied as a credit on my claim against P. H. Adams. (I holding a second lien on the property sold by Chewning & ■Sands June 13th, 1891) and which amount was applied towards the payment of several past due notes held by the Planters National Bank, Richmond, Virginia, and together with the past due interest and fees amounting to the sum of ($5,062.81)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Scraggs v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

Horne v. HolleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
Carkonen v. AlbertsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
Matney v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
Jackson v. PleasantonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.