Marsh v. Valentine Marsh's Executors
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On accounting in partition suit.
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
On going over and considering the entire record in this suit, including the accounts and exceptions, my present view is that no account can be equitably taken between the parties without taking in the entire accounts of Frank Marsh, as trustee, previous to May 1st, 1904. This will include his accounts for the income of the other real or personal estate, as well as the rents of the real estate in New Jersey, which has been partitioned and sold in this suit. In the matter of the accounting, the case is one of some complication, and the status on the whole record is as follows:
The…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Cronin's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hobbs v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Schuster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.