Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentPaez, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent on two separate grounds. First, I cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. The record contains no “final decision” of the district court, as 28 U.S.C. § 1291 requires. Second, even if we did have jurisdiction, I do not agree with the majority that plaintiffs have adequately stated claims for relief under California’s Cartwright Act and unfair competition law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. Accepting plaintiffs’ allegations as true, as we must under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.