Legal Opinion
Intex Recreation Corporation v. Team Worldwide Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2004-1785PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
Ten years ago, defendant Team Worldwide Corporation (“TWW”) accused plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation (“Intex”) of infringing the claims of TWW’s inflatable product patent. This lawsuit followed, and with it, the initiation of discovery, proceedings on a motion to dismiss, a reexamination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), and claim construction proceedings.
The issue that spurred this lawsuit— whether the air mattresses manufactured by Intex infringe any of. the patent claims asserted by TWW — is now before the Court on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intex Recreation Corporation v. Team Worldwide CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc v. Oz-Post International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019