Legal Opinion
Peck v. Aetna Life Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 1, 2007No. Civil Action 3:04-cv-1139 (JCH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 117], DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL (Doc. No. 119), AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. NO. 130]
HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Peck has brought this action pursuant to section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, alleging that defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) wrongfully denied her longterm disability benefits. Both Peek and Aetna have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. Nos. 130 & 117).…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Martha Kinstler v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeCesare v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Kellner v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Mead v. ReliaStar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2010
- Christopher Patterson v. Aetna Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Witt v. Intel Corporation Long-Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024