Legal Opinion
Shockman v. State Farm Lloyds
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 26, 2025No. 4:22-cv-02030Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 29, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION CARLETON J. SHOCKMAN, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-02030 § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Like many others, Plaintiff Carleton J. Shockman’s home suffered hail and storm damage in 2021. He claimed coverage for the damage under his insurance policy with Defendant State Farm Lloyds. State Farm denied coverage, concluding that Shockman’s loss resulted from excluded causes. Shockman sued State Farm for breach of contract and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.