Legal Opinion

State v. VANKIRK

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2011No. 29A02-1012-CR-1418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State appeals a reserved question of law after the trial court found Gordon Vankirk not guilty of operating a motor vehicle while privileges are forfeited for life, a class C felony. 1

We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court improperly found that Vankirk’s driving privileges had not been forfeited for life because Vankirk’s sentence for operating of a motor vehicle while an habitual traffic violator had been modified from a class D felony to a class A misdemeanor.

FACTS

On February 1, 2005, Vankirk pleaded guilty under cause number 29D05-0405-FD-2990…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrunnerIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Klotz v. HoytIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Pendleton v. AguilarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Indiana Municipal Power Agency v. Town of EdinburghIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joshua McCaine Pillow v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Jason Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State of Indiana and Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Daniel ReinhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Michael Damien Howell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Thomas Porter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API