Legal Opinion

Eckhart v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1999No. 24328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission denying apportionment of benefits from the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF), after the Commission found the claimant, Ronnie Dean Eckhart, totally and permanently disabled under the odd-lot doctrine on account of his work-related injury to his back. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

On July 30,1990, in the employ of Western Dairymen’s Association, Eckhart fell down some stairs and injured his lower back. At the time of the accident, Eckhart was forty-five years old and had worked for Dairymen’s thirteen years, most…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bybee v. State, Indus. Special Indem.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Boise Orthopedic Clinic v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hope v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Andrews v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. LuAnn Shubert v. Macy's West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API