Shipp v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtG-riffiN Smith, C. J.
Appellant, riding on the back seat of an automobile driven by his brother, was injured when a collision occurred where East Third and Locust streets in North Little Rock intersect. There was substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict in favor of the Transportation Company.
It is insisted by appellant that Instructions numbered 9, and 9%, given at the request of appellee,, are erroneous. Appellant also urges that a safety ordinance of the city of North Little Rock, two sections of which were introduced over objections, was inadmissible because it is in conflict with statutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mays v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Herring v. BollingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Carter v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Pollock v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Hurley v. Gus Blass CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kisor v. Tulsa Rendering Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Gill v. Whiteside-Hemby Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Elliott v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ModeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Kendrick v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951