Legal Opinion

Rose v. Missouri District Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.

Action, by plaintiff, respondent here, against Missouri District Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Union Electric Light & Power Company to recover damages for alleged personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the sum of $50,000, and each defendant .appealed. The three appeals were jointly submitted and will be disposed of in one opinion.

For brevity we will refer to defendants as telegraph company, telephone eompanjr and light company. Each of the companies was engaged in the business its name indicates in the city of St. Louis. The telephone company owned a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  2. McGuire v. . Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Pointer v. Mountain Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Otto v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. La Duke v. Hudson River Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Thompson v. Byers Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Morris v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Mrad v. Missouri Edison Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API