Simmons v. Chicago Housing Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY
Plaintiff Carol Simmons brought suit against defendant, the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA), claiming that defendant was negligent in hiring, supervising and directing security guards from Triad Security. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial and the trial court granted the motion after finding that the jury’s verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. A new trial was held and the jury found in favor of plaintiff and awarded her $200,000 in damages. Defendant appeals and we reverse the judgment of the trial court and enter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Pippin v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- First National Bank v. City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Phillips v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stephens v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Carroll v. AkporeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Lenehan v. Township Officers Electoral BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Griffin v. Prairie Dog Limited PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Matteo Construction Co. v. Teckler Blvd Development Site, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.