Stephens v. Taylor
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
We are asked to determine whether a party who was denied leave to appeal from a petition filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(1) (166 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(1)) after a new trial was granted is foreclosed from raising the same issues in a subsequent appeal. We hold that if the merits of the first petition were not addressed by the appellate court, then those issues are not foreclosed in a later appeal.
FACTS
In November of 1998, plaintiff Agnes Stephens filed an action against the Moline Housing Authority and Steven Taylor (collectively, the Housing Authority) for malicious prosecution and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kemner v. Monsanto Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Robbins v. Professional Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- LaPook v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- MacK v. First Security Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Bilderback v. Admiral Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stephens v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Almanza v. Town of CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Stephens v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Stephens v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2003