Legal Opinion

Powell v. Horne Powell v. Mizell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

The above cases were consolidated and a trial culminated in separate verdicts in favor of the respective plaintiffs. The alleged injury resulted from the collision of a gasoline-bearing truck owned by co-partners, who were plaintiffs in the one case, driven by the plaintiff in the other case, and a freight train operated by the defendant.

We have carefully examined all of the testimony introduced, including photographs taken at the instance of parties to the suit, and are of the opinion that the question whether the plaintiffs should have recovered is a close one even in the light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinderer v. Ann Arbor Railroad Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Yazoo M.R. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bazemore v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Eskridge's Ex'rs v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway CoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  5. Tuttle v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loftin v. McGregorSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. SEABOARD COAST LINE RD. CO. v. FriddleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Dade County v. CarucciDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Sparks v. Southeastern Greyhound LinesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API