Legal Opinion

People v. Ungurean

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1974No. Docket 16051PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial under the so-called habitual criminal act. MCLA 769.12; MSA 28.1084. He appeals of right.

He asserts first that his conviction as a habitual criminal violated MCLA 780.131; MSA 28.969(1) and MCLA 780.133; MSA 28.969(3):

"Section 1. Whenever the department of corrections shall receive notice that there is pending in this state any untried warrant, indictment, information or complaint setting forth against any inmate of a penal institution of this state a criminal offense for which a prison sentence might be imposed upon conviction, such ^inmate shall be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. HattMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. ShotwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. BinieckiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. HendrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. ConnorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. RedwineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. Reginald HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API