Legal Opinion

Adcock v. First City Bank of Alice

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 14, 1990No. 04-90-00121-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIERY, Justice.

First City Bank of Alice (“the Bank”) sued Nita Adcock and Roy Allen Adcock, guarantors, to recover the deficiency on an unpaid promissory note. The Adcocks answered and counterclaimed that the Bank had not properly complied with the notice and commercially reasonable sale requirements of Chapter 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code.

In answer to the only issue submitted, the jury found that an agreement existed between the Bank and Nita Adcock and that the collateral was sold pursuant to that agreement. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hopkins v. First National Bank at BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. MBank Dallas N.A. v. Sunbelt Manufacturing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Beltran v. Groos Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  5. Favors v. YaffeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tex Star Motors, Inc. v. Regal Finance Company, Ltd. and Regal Finance Company II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. Gray v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. In Re Alcom America Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. BoslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Roquemore v. National Commerce BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API