Gulzoni v. Tyler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The court erred in sustaining objections to the introduction of evidence by the defendants to prove that, at the time when the plaintiff received the injuries complained of, the defendants were not managing, controlling, or running the steamer on which the plaintiff Avas injured, but that the same Avas run, managed, and controlled by the “California Steam Navigation Company.” Such evidence Avas relevant to a material issue in the case. The plaintiff alleged that said steamer was employed by the defendants in carrying passengers, etc., and that said “ defendants so negligently and unsldllfully…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- The BarnstableSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Grodsky v. Consolidated Bag Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Peterson v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.