Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Levine

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

■ Contract for $200 alleged to be due for professional services as an attorney at law rendered to the defendant by the plaintiff. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated January 21, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action brought by an attorney at law to recover $200 for professional services rendered to the defendant. It appears from the report that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to settle a demand made on the latter for an alleged assault upon the wife of one Rabkin; that the plaintiff succeeded in making an arrangement with Rabkin and his wife by which, upon the payment of $50, the defendant was to be absolved from civil liability, and was to be permitted to remove his goods which were held by the Rabkins; that as the defendant did not then have $50 to complete the settlement,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illustrated Card & Novelty Co. v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Keystone Grape Co. v. HustisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ahern v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Ansin v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Dutton v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. National Wholesale Grocery Co. v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Wasilauskas v. Brookline Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API