Legal Opinion
State v. Kier
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2004No. A03-643PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant John Fredrick Kier was convicted of first-degree refusal to submit to testing under Minn.Stat. §§ 169A.20, subd. 2, and 169A.24 (2002), possession of open bottle under Minn.Stat. § 169A.35, subd. 2 (2002), transportation of firearms under Minn.Stat. §§ 97B.045 (2002), and driving after cancellation under Minn.Stat. § 171.24, subd. 5 (2002). He challenges his convictions arguing the police did not have probable cause to believe he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Kier also challenges his 66-month commitment to the commissioner of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In re the Welfare of I.N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard WessmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.