Legal Opinion

Repp v. American Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1930No. 27,566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover on a policy insuring plaintiff’s automobile among other things against “theft, robbery or pilferage.” There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $450. The defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted, and from the judgment entered the plaintiff appeals. The only question is whether the auto was stolen within the meaning of the words “theft, robbery or pilferage” used in the policy.

Paul Repp, the plaintiff, a man of 80, was the owner of the auto which he had purchased about June 1, 1927, and for which he obtained a policy of insurance on August 18,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Valley Mercantile Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Royal Insurance v. JackOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bloom v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Gunn v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kovero v. Hudson Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. LaMotte v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Mullany v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Toms v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API