Legal Opinion
Primarque Prods. Co. v. Williams W. & Witts Prods. Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15–30067–TSHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Barron also testified that he could not articulate how Primarque's transition of business from WWW to other soup base suppliers would affect WWW's alleged non-solicitation obligation.
Barron repeated the third version of the alleged agreement in his deposition, but limited WWW's alleged non-solicitation obligation only to the Drop Ship Customers. He testified that the alleged non-solicitation agreement required WWW not to sell directly to any Drop Ship Customers provided Primarque was selling WWW products to the Drop Ship Customers. Barron further testified that WWW's obligation under the oral…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morris v. Government Development BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Primarque Products Co., Inc. v. Williams W. & Witt's Prod. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021