Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 25, 1973No. 1161-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 Wn. App. 180 (1973)

511 P.2d 1020

EDWIN HAMILTON et al., Respondents,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 1161-1.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One — Panel 1.

June 25, 1973.

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Betts, R.L. Gemson, and Alfred McBee, for appellant.

Voris & Lipscomb and Michael C. Lipscomb, for respondents.

WILLIAMS, J.

This action was brought by Edwin Hamilton and his wife, the insured, to recover damages from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the insurer, and Frederick V. Betts, an attorney, because of a judgment taken against the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. LouieWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API