Legal Opinion
Kuntsman v. Guaranteed Equities, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1986No. 16166PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
The director of the Financial Institutions Division of the New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department brought an action against Guaranteed Equities, Inc. (Equities), a mortgage broker, charging illegal and fraudulent activity. The court appointed a receiver and held a hearing on the receiver’s motion to determine distribution of certain loan proceeds claimed by John and Joan Huntsman [Kunstman] and by Robert Holzapfel. The trial court, finding that both Huntsmans and Holzapfel were investors, apportioned the proceeds between the Huntsmans and Holzapfel, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy Oil Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Acceptance Co. of America v. Exchange National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Phoenix Title and Trust Company v. Myles Stewart, Trustee of the Estate of Arthur Peabody and Olive PeabodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Angle v. SlaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Palmer v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AG New Mexico v. Borges (In re Borges)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Finch v. Beneficial New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Selby v. RoggowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- McInerny v. Guaranteed Equities, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Las Uvas Valley Dairies (In re Las Uvas Valley Dairies)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2019