(PS) Bizhko v. McKinnon
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUSLAN A. BIZHKO, No. 2:21-cv-01137-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE 14 THOMAS MCKINNON, et al., TO AMEND 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is 18 referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff’s 19 complaint filed on June 28, 2021, is before the court for screening and plaintiff has filed an 20 application in support of his request…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.